Reading is out of style.

It’s been a common complaint throughout the ages that “the younger generations are worse than us”. It was said during Marlowe’s time, Hardy’s time, Waugh’s time, my time, and probably hundred years from now. But just how much of this is the truth, really?

The truth of the matter is: in matter of things that require long time to develop, probably.

Our lives have been getting busier and busier. Back in Hardy’s day it’s rather clear a woman could learn handwriting and had time to read; then Waugh’s time came and girls were flitting around having parties; nowadays handwriting is almost virtually unheard of.

Busier and busier means less and less time. No, a day is still 24 hours, but there is less time to spend per activity. And as our lives get busier and busier, things get more mass-produced and quickly digested (seriously, how many books have you read the past month?). Reading is out. Movies and games are in. And if you read, well, congratulations, you are now a minority group. Borders is closed, Spenser is kicked off the bookshelf… if such thing even exists in people’s houses.

I’m not saying yesterday is better, but I think we had a bit more emotional capacity in the past. People used to write love letters; now skype and text have replaced them, and quite frankly, they’re about as dry and tasteless as a week old slice of bread.

The Art of Sarcasm

Sarcasm, it seems, would be the English virtue, and not much of a virtue anywhere else. Of course, for those who consider the world to be a stage, sarcasms are just as witty as any other types of humour, and taking jibes at each other would be something that shows witticism and brevity, not a personal insult.

This would be a personal insult:

“You are ugly.”

This would be sarcasm:

“Your face is so beautiful I think I want to gouge my eyeballs out.”

The thing is, sarcasm can be taken as a way to circumspectly insult someone else, but the insult has to be received by someone who has an equal or better comprehension of the motives behind the word choices. In other words, one needs a sarcasm sensor to not get offended by it.

In many cases amongst the islanders, sarcasm is so ingrained within everyday conversations that one doesn’t even consider whether it is a personal insult or not.  This would not necessarily be meant to be hurtful, rather the acerbic tone is just a characteristic, and not meant to be taken personally. It’s a fine line that does not seem to translate, even if there are very little language barriers.

Case in point:

A: “I hate Dostoyevsky.”

B: “I find him quite interesting.”

A: “Don’t be ridiculous, you haven’t read a book in your life.”

This is rather direct, and therefore meant as an insult. It better be taken as an insult, otherwise Speaker A would officially categorise Speaker B as an imbecile and any kind of discourse would be over. Oh dear, this person can’t even identify insults. He would need to be fed and taught how to sit on hind paws would be what speaker A is thinking, in all possibilities.

However:

A: “I hate Dostoyevsky.”

B: “I find him quite interesting.”

A: “You read?!”

This conversation leaves B with two choices: one, to take the final remark as an insult and get mortally offended, in which case Nesbit’s observation that a person gets angry when the truth is told might be proven true; or two, B can come back with a witticism, in which the ball is back in A’s court. Thus a lively banter continues, a competition of wit as well as patience.

However, this kind of verbal tennis requires training, of which most do not grow up with. And then they get mortally offended, and the speaker A walks away, shaking his/her head, thinking “so much for humour and esprit. What happened to the sense of wit?”

Awaken.

She rises, like a silver phoenix rising from the ashes of the ocean, mantled in her hair, so dark, her eyes dark, filled with the mysteries of the past.

He gazes, his green eyes focused on the future, determination and resolution shading the eyes darker than its original green to a viridian hue.

The sunlight turns into molten platinum, washing out the two stills.

She raises her head, her hair unfurling; she narrows her eyes slightly, feeling the thrums of the earth’s living pulse through her fingertips.

He lowers his head, perhaps a sign of obedience, or acknowledgement.

The two mortals awaken, the land green and verdant, the wind giving them their first breaths. Their song will be the one of ice and fire, life and death, wars and battles conquered.

She unfurls her long arms, arms like a long, white snake.

The forest awakens.

Category: 0 comments

Pens, wax seals, and other antiquities.

My pen fancy has struck me again, and I've been having fun with my pens and inks, partly because suddenly I have found myself inundated with correspondence and just things that requires actual writing, as opposed to e-mails and other modern technologies. There are quite a world out there that you can designate as your combination, with nib widths, ink colours, and paper.

For example, I use moleskine for my notes. A red cahier, actually, and I use Platinum Preppy and Lamy EF to write in them. My colleague uses Rhodia and Pilot. Quite a different end-product (mine definitely looks more feminine, hands down). Mine’s a bit more colourful, owing to quite a few Preppies I have at my arsenal.

It’s been a while since I’ve written this much by hand. Sure, I take my notes by hand, mark papers by hand, but they’re jotting, really, not much more than a few sentences at a time. But with these, letters included, they’re proper writing, with sitting down, thinking, picking up a pen. It’s a rather methodical process: sit down, select the ink (or make sure the ink is loaded), ponder what to write, place the ink eradicators and whatnot around, uncap the pen, begin writing. It’s a bit different from snatching a Bic from the table and jotting a few notes.

Writing (not typing, but writing), as I’ve recently rediscovered, is a rather thoughtful, meditative process. I’ve written letters – constantly, even, as Mr “I want to remain nameless” and I have kept steady correspondence across the Atlantic and across the continent for the past seven years – but only recently have I closely examined the actual process of writing, both mental and physical. Unlike word processing, you can’t really just hit backspace and delete the sentence you wrote, so you tend to get more careful as you write. Word selection becomes a little more important; penmanship becomes a little more of a concern; and unlike e-mails, there is an actual physical process of destroying letters, as opposed to just hitting delete, so each word becomes heavier.

Your emotions do show up in your penmanship. When I am distressed, my handwriting becomes a little more erratic; when I am calm, they are neater, more regular. My ink colour selection also reflects my mood; when I am feeling prim and proper, I tend to select blue; when I am feeling fanciful, brighter colours show up.

I think, as we progress through technology, we are losing more and more personal touches. Letters became phone calls, which became e-mails and instant messaging; and severing ties became easier and easier, until all it took were two buttons to hit delete. Cards became replaced with facebook messages and e-cards, which get lost in the myriad of electronic information we get bombarded with. Relationships between two people can be quickly forgotten with a few clicks, the past sealed away.

Is this a good thing? Perhaps. Perhaps it is a good thing to be able to forget the past and seal away previous acquaintances. But I am glad Mr Nameless had written me letters all this time; I’d be cleaning my room and stumble upon the bundle of letters he wrote, and I’d remember the ache. Once upon a time, he and I were happy. Those moments were forever crystallised in those penned words, and it’s much harder to rip up letters than hit delete on a phone.

Mr Nameless has taken a step further (oh dear). He has decided that pen nib, his penmanship (or a lack thereof…), and his ink colours don’t quite identify the sender as himself. And so, enter sealing waxes.

Originally, as we know, sealing waxes were designed for hand-delivered letters, to prevent tampering. It’s a bit more ceremonial these days, but I think he wants an ending action to his letter-writing. After all, he writes to me the most, and apparently, he has a sort of a ritual; a nice cup of tea, a pen, an ink colour selected out (although it’s usually blue… different shade of blue, perhaps?), good writing pad in front of him, looking out the window, music filtering out from the speakers. Writing is reaching out to the recipient through pen and paper, and the paper is actually something the writer has touched, felt; it’s different from a printed out e-mail. It is akin to what Cyrano said, in Edmond Rostand’s play Cyrano de Bergerac:

Un baiser, mais à tout prendre, qu'est-ce ?
Un serment fait d'un peu plus près, une promesse
Plus précise, un aveu qui veut se confirmer,
Un point rose qu'on met sur l'i du verbe aimer;
C'est un secret qui prend la bouche pour oreille,
Un instant d'infini qui fait un bruit d'abeille,
Une communion ayant un goût de fleur,
Une façon d'un peu se respirer le cœur,
Et d'un peu se goûter, au bord des lèvres, l'âme !

Not quite a kiss, our letters, but a promise all the same; a hug stuffed in an envelope, a kiss lovingly tucked into a page. And when he finishes tucking that hug into the paper, apparently he wants to seal it with wax and a seal that says, “it’s from me”.

And so he has his seal, and he has his samples of wax. He’s trying to decide between midnight blue, forest green, and silver. He’s leaning towards green but he also likes silver. I’ve told him to maybe mix both. He’s pondering. Another mark left on paper to tell me that he’s in my life, and that we share moments, even when we are apart.

Beautiful, isn’t it?

Paquita - Variation V Shostakovich - Tea for Two